Bell v. Brooks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 6, 2005

Bell v. Brooks, 144 F. App'x 362 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Bell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bell v. Brooks, No. CA-03-938-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Reference

Full Case Name: Mark Anthony BELL, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Mr. BROOKS, Warden John Doe, Institutional Doctor Ms. Appante, Hospital Administrator, Defendants—Appellees, and Ms. Apontay, Medical Administrator
Status: Published