Richardson v. Swanson Services

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 27, 2005

Richardson v. Swanson Services, 146 F. App'x 696 (4th Cir. 2005)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Swanson Services, No. CA-03-2426-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *697the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Curtis Dale RICHARDSON, Plaintiff—Appellant v. SWANSON SERVICES, and Phillip Thompson, Sheriff of Horry County in his official and individual capacity Mark Sanford, Governor of South Carolina Jim Mcclain, Director of Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services Gwendolyn A. Bright, Director of Parole Board Support Services
Status: Published