United States v. Christy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 5, 2006

Opinion

No. 05-6975

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-9)

Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: January 5, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Robert Christy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Carl Robert Christy appeals the district court’s order

denying his former Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. See United States v. Christy, No. CR-

89-9 (E.D.N.C. filed May 23, 2005 & entered May 24, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

- 2 -