AJ v. Skojec
AJ v. Skojec
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1419
AJ, A minor child by his father Joel D. Joseph; JOEL D. JOSEPH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
MICHAEL W. SKOJEC; GALLAGHER, EVELIUS & JONES, LLP; BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY; HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04-4069-1-AMD)
Submitted: December 12, 2005 Decided: January 5, 2006
Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joel D. Joseph, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellants. Peter E. Keith, Brian T. Tucker, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; George M. Church, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, PC, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles W. Thompson, Jr., County Attorney, Joann Robertson, Chief, Division of Litigation, Karen L. Federman Henry, Principal Counsel for Appeals, Patricia P. Via, Associate County Attorney, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting
Defendants’ motion to dismiss Appellants’
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000)
action, and awarding attorneys fees to Defendants. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See AJ v.
Skojec, No. CA-04-4069-1-AMD (D. Md. Feb. 22 & Apr. 22, 2005). We
deny Appellants’ motion for an injunction as moot. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished