United States v. Claiborne
United States v. Claiborne
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7679
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FERRONE CLAIBORNE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-00-383; CA-04-151)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 4, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ferrone Claiborne, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ferrone Claiborne seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a
§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A
certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by
the district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of
the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)
(2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Claiborne has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El
v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336(2003). Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished