Allen v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
Dallice Allen appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint in which she asserted that the Social Security Administration unlawfully suspended her benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Social Security Admin., No. CA-04-280 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 18, 2005; entered Feb. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dallice M. ALLEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Kathleen A. Mika; Denise Riddle; Blake Gordan; Social Security Disability and Appeals, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished