U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Sekeon v. Gonzales

Sekeon v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 19, 2006 · Niemeyer, Williams, Traxler
161 F. App'x 338

Sekeon v. Gonzales

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jemmy Fersn Sekeon and Steven Hennry Sekeon, brothers, are natives and citizens of Indonesia. The Sekeons petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s order denying their request for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. * They claim that the Board erred in affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their applications for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n. 13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S. 407, 430, 104 S.Ct. 2489, 81 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that the Sekeons have failed to meet this standard. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

*

The Sekeons do not challenge the Board’s denial of the asylum claim as untimely or the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.