U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Moore v. Dept of the Navy

Moore v. Dept of the Navy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2006

Moore v. Dept of the Navy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2519

ROGERS MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-154-7-F)

Submitted: January 6, 2006 Decided: January 23, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest J. Wright, Jacksonville, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Joshua B. Royster, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Rogers Moore appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in his action alleging claims of employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A § 2000e et seq.; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 621 et seq.; and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 791 et seq.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Department of the Navy, No. 03-CV-154 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.