U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Crites v. Consolidation Coal Co.

Crites v. Consolidation Coal Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 31, 2006 · Widener, Williams, Hamilton
164 F. App'x 401

Crites v. Consolidation Coal Co.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clarence O. Crites seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Crites v. Consolidation Coal Co., Nos. 03-0108-BLA; 03-0108-BLA-A (BRB Oct. 31, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.