Johnson v. Pep Boys
Johnson v. Pep Boys
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1612
BENJAMIN A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK; UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; US GOVERNMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-04-632-2)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr., Andrew Philip Sherrod, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Johnson’s civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Johnson v. Pep Boys, No. CA-04-632-2 (E.D. Va. Jun. 14,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished