Johnson v. Pep Boys

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Pep Boys

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1612

BENJAMIN A. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK; UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; US GOVERNMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-04-632-2)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr., Andrew Philip Sherrod, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Johnson’s civil action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Johnson v. Pep Boys, No. CA-04-632-2 (E.D. Va. Jun. 14,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished