Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 10, 2006

Opinion

No. 05-1941

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-03-2373-1-JFM)

Submitted: January 23, 2006 Decided: February 10, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Gan, PEER & GAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant in this civil action

alleging breach of the duty of fair representation. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers Assoc., No.

CA-03-2373-1-JFM (D. Md. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

- 2 -