U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers

Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 2006

Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1941

WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-03-2373-1-JFM)

Submitted: January 23, 2006 Decided: February 10, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Gan, PEER & GAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this civil action alleging breach of the duty of fair representation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taccino v. National Rural Letter Carriers Assoc., No. CA-03-2373-1-JFM (D. Md. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.