Eng v. Norfolk Southern

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Eng v. Norfolk Southern

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1665

WILLIAM T. ENG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-134-7)

Submitted: January 23, 2006 Decided: February 15, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Agnis C. Chakravorty, Frank K. Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William T. Eng appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment to Norfolk Southern Corp. on his race and national-origin

discrimination claims under Title VII and

42 U.S.C. § 1981

. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Eng v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. CA-02-134-7 (W.D.

Va. May 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished