Eng v. Norfolk Southern
Eng v. Norfolk Southern
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1665
WILLIAM T. ENG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-134-7)
Submitted: January 23, 2006 Decided: February 15, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Agnis C. Chakravorty, Frank K. Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William T. Eng appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to Norfolk Southern Corp. on his race and national-origin
discrimination claims under Title VII and
42 U.S.C. § 1981. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Eng v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. CA-02-134-7 (W.D.
Va. May 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished