U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Holmes v. SSA

Holmes v. SSA
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 21, 2006

Holmes v. SSA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2173

DEON MAURICE HOLMES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Social Security Administrator, Larry F. Massanari, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-04-590-3-HEH)

Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deon Maurice Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Deon Maurice Holmes appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to the Commissioner, and thus affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied.

See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Holmes’ motion for change of physician and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

See Holmes v. Social Sec. Admin., No. CA-04-590-3-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.