Gregory C. Epperson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Epperson v. Fahey, No. CA-05-523 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 23 & entered Sept. 26, 2005). We deny Epperson’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *775 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED