U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Ortuno v. Yancey

Ortuno v. Yancey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 2, 2006 · Widener, Niemeyer, King
172 F. App'x 509

Ortuno v. Yancey

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ortuno, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ortuno v. Yancey, No. CA-04-23242-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.