Stuart A. Middleton appeals from the district court’s order denying his third motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Middleton v. Jones, No. CA-04-406 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral *509 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.