United States v. Dantzler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 1, 2006

Opinion

No. 05-7016

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CR-01-331)

Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 1, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry L. Dantzler, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Barton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harry L. Dantzler appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to amend the complaint, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Dantzler, No. CR-01-331 (D.S.C.

June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

- 2 -