Ralph E. Perry seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Perry’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Perry v. Gowan, No. 3:05-cv-00543-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED