Charles A. Walker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *267 error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Walker v. Greensville Corr. Ctr., No. CA-05-1066-1CMH (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2005). We deny Walker’s pending motions to file a supplemental brief, for a “temporary” and a “preliminary” restraining order, and for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED