Michael W. Rogers appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. * See Rogers v. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co., No. CA-04-41-5 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED