Jimmie Hugene Woodson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woodson v. Laury, Nos. CA-05-496-2; CA-05-496 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 29 & entered Sept. 30 & Oct. 25, 2005). We deny Woodson’s motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED