Robinson v. Fahey
Robinson v. Fahey
174 F. App'x 757
Robinson v. Fahey
Opinion
Frank A. Robinson appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Robinson v. Fahey, No. CA-04-149-3DGL (E.D. Va. April 15 & 21, 2005). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.