Mack Ray Little appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. *305 § 3582(c)(l)(2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Little, No. CR-92-27-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED