Chris Rhodes appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Social Security benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhodes v. Commissioner, No. CA-04-22-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.