U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Aksenov v. Gonzales

Aksenov v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2006 · Niemeyer, Traxler, Gregory
176 F. App'x 426

Aksenov v. Gonzales

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Evgeny Aksenov, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s oral decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review.

The INA authorizes the Attorney General to confer asylum on any refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (2000). It defines a refugee as a person unwilling or unable to return to his native country “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2000). We agree with the Board that Aksenov failed to show entitlement to asylum or withholding from removal. He failed to show the past events were as a result of his membership in a particular social group. We also agree with the Board that Aksenov failed to show that more likely than not he will face torture if he returns to Russia, as it is defined by the regulation. See 8 C.F.R. 1208.18(a)(1) (2005).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.