U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Houchens v. Huddleston

Houchens v. Huddleston
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 26, 2006 · Luttig, Traxler, King
178 F. App'x 208

Counsel

Barry Neil Houchens, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Houchens v. Huddleston

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Barry Neil Houchens appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *209 See Houchens v. Huddleston, No. CA-05-246-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.