U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 2006 · Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
178 F. App'x 325

United States v. Williams

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jemal Walter Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. CR-94-210-7 (D.S.C. Dec. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.