U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

In Re: Rogers v.

In Re: Rogers v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 2006 · Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
179 F. App'x 171

In Re: Rogers v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hayward Leon Rogers petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court dismissed Rogers’ § 2254 petition without prejudice on February 28, 2006. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Rogers’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.