U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Taylor v. Stansberry

Taylor v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2006 · Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
178 F. App'x 272

Taylor v. Stansberry

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James W. Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-678-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.