U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Slupkowski v. Eternick

Slupkowski v. Eternick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2006

Slupkowski v. Eternick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7409

STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RANDY ETERNICK, Associate Warden for Medical Services at FMC - Butner, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-05-214-5-BO)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley A. Slupkowski, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Stanley A. Slupkowski appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Slupkowski v. Eternick, No. CA-05-214-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.