U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Ellis

United States v. Ellis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 8, 2006 · Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
179 F. App'x 176

United States v. Ellis

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mardy Lamont Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Request Amendment to PSR” and his “Motion for Leave of Court to Move Sentencing Judge to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 35) Substantial Assistance.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *177 See United States v. Ellis, No. 2:00-cr-00084-JBF (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 15, 2006; entered Feb. 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.