George Sutton, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sutton v. Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2005); Sutton v. Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED