Joseph T. Haranzo appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Haranzo v. Virginia Dep’t of Rehabilitative Servs., No. CA-05-326-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 15, 2005). In addition, we deny Haranzo’s request for a trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED