U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Berrow v. Bissette

Berrow v. Bissette
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 23, 2006 · Williams, Motz, Traxler
182 F. App'x 184

Counsel

Melvin Douglas Berrow, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Harper Graham, Assistant Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Berrow v. Bissette

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Douglas Berrow appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Berrow v. Bissette, No. 5:04-ct-00510-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.