Alexander O’Brian Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order construing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), as a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Adams, No. CA-05-553-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED