DeVinche Albritton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as amended and supplemented for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Albritton v. Edwards, No. CA-05-00384-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 25, 2005). Further, we deny Albritton’s motion for injunctive relief as it lacks merit, and deny his motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED