Ault v. Haines
Ault v. Haines
184 F. App'x 339
Ault v. Haines
Opinion
Stoney William Ault, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ault v. Haines, No. CA-04-94 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.