U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Marshall v. Rushton

Marshall v. Rushton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 22, 2006 · Williams, Michael, Traxler
187 F. App'x 274

Counsel

Elijah Marshall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Marshall v. Rushton

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Marshall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Marshall, however, waived his right to appeal by failing timely to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. See Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir. 1997). We therefore dismiss the appeal. Id. at 200. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.