U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Bazemore

United States v. Bazemore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 21, 2006

United States v. Bazemore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6068

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

LEVON BAZEMORE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00371-SGW)

Submitted: June 7, 2006 Decided: June 21, 2006

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Levon Bazemore, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas L. Eckert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Levon Bazemore, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bazemore, No. 7:05-cv-00371-SGW (W.D.

Va. Dec. 16, 2005). We grant Bazemore’s application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.