U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Burns v. LaManna

Burns v. LaManna
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2006

Burns v. LaManna

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6357

CLINTON BURNS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

JOHN J. LAMANNA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:05-cv-03163-HMH)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Burns, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Clinton Burns, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burns v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03163-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 19, and Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.