U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

McNeil v. Bazzle

McNeil v. Bazzle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 29, 2006

McNeil v. Bazzle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6221

JAMES ELLIOTT MCNEIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; J. BRATKA, Officer at Perry Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cv-00240-HMH)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Elliott McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Elliott McNeil appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Bazzle, No. 2:05-cv-00240-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.