U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 3, 2006 · Niemeyer, Michael, Gregory

187 F. App'x 329

Counsel

Dennis Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Scheming, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 1:89-cr-00104-CCB-6 (D.Md., Jan. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.