Guillermo Benitez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Benitez, No. 2:94-cr-00052-RBS-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.