U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Williams v. Adams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 24, 2006 · Widener, Wilkinson, Hamilton

190 F. App'x 240

Counsel

Andre Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Michael Edward Lockridge, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andre Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Adams, No. CA-05-220-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.