United States v. Johnson
United States v. Johnson
193 F. App'x 201
United States v. Johnson
Opinion
Craig Edward Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 5:04-cr-00314-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.