U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Sea \B\" Mining Co v. DOWCP"

Sea \B\" Mining Co v. DOWCP"
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 22, 2006 · Duncan, Michael, Niemeyer, Per Curiam
195 F. App'x 131

Sea \B\" Mining Co v. DOWCP"

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sea “B” Mining Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Rowe v. Sea “B” Mining Co., No. 04-950-BLA (BRB Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.