U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Wardrick v. Warden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 1, 2006 · Duncan, King, Per Curiam, Shedd

197 F. App'x 258

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Wardrick, a federal inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Wardrick v. Warden, No. 1:06-cv-01274-AMD (D.Md. May 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials in the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. *

AFFIRMED

To the extent Wardrick may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, challenging the search and seizure warrant, we deny authorization.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.