Rice v. LaManna
Rice v. LaManna
197 F. App'x 259
Rice v. LaManna
Opinion
James Robert Rice, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03078-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.