Black v. Dawkins
Black v. Dawkins
197 F. App'x 249
Black v. Dawkins
Opinion
James Kevin Black appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Black v. Dawkins, No. 3:06-cv-00194-MU (W.D.N.C. filed May 2, 2006 & entered May 3, 2006). We deny Black’s motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.